Ethical Dilemmas of Generative AI in Higher Education Implications for Academic Integrity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26034/fr.jehe.2026.9459Keywords:
Technology Acceptance Model, Digital Infrastructure, Connectivism, ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, Ethical Dilemmas, Academic IntegrityAbstract
The development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has intensified debates regarding academic integrity in digitally mediated higher education. This study explored AI-related ethical dilemmas affecting academic integrity at a South African research-intensive university. It examined how graduate students interpret and navigate ethical tensions in AI use, and how institutional and structural conditions shape these experiences. A qualitative single-case design was used. Sixteen graduate students from a School of Public Health participated through open-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase reflexive thematic analysis. The study was theoretically informed by an integrative framework combining the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and connectivism, extended through an academic integrity lens. Two interrelated themes emerged. First, students articulated an ethical adoption tension: while recognising AI’s usefulness and efficiency, they expressed concerns about overreliance, blurred authorship, data privacy, and the erosion of critical thinking and scholarly identity. Second, participants highlighted structural and institutional conditions shaping AI engagement, including unequal access to digital resources, uncertainty about institutional expectations, and the need for ethical AI literacy. The study offers a contextually grounded perspective from a Global South setting and reframes academic integrity in the AI era as a systemic governance issue requiring clear AI-integrated academic integrity policies, responsible implementation mechanisms, assessment redesign, and shared institutional accountability.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Stephen Mongwe, Geesje Van den Berg, Patience Kelebogile Mudau

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal articles of Globethics Publications are published under the open Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which guarantees the rights of licensor and allows free use and re-use to the licensees (the readers) who can: 1) Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format 2) Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material provided appropriate credit is given and similar license is used in case of such adaptations. Content should not be used for commercial purposes. Each article (the version of record) can be deposited by the author on their academic institutional repository or personal author webpage.




